Tuesday, October 9, 2012

Feature

A Chinese student works as a kitchen hand in a Chinese restaurant. He is paid only $10 per hour, from 10 o’clock in the morning to 9 o’clock at night, 3 days a week, preparing food, clearning floors and carrying heavy boxes of food. On the other days he struggles to complete his degree at university, a full-time job in itself. This is an international student’s working reality. What drives this situation? Why does it happen? 

Unfair working conditions on the Gold Coast for international students, especially Chinese, are becoming alarmingly widespread. Overseas students claim they are being exploited by employers, who are paying them below award wages for casual work. They are forced to accept slave labour wages and illegal working conditions under Australian law.

Most students work in restaurants, supermarkets, hotels, and convenience stores. The salaries for part-time jobs range from the restaurant or supermarket minimum wage of $22 per hour for more professional jobs, like personal care assistants.
However, international students claim that the legal minimum wage is not always paid by Gold Coast employers, with more than 80% of students paid less than the legal salaries.

A 24-years-old Chinese student Guyi Wei worked for one year in a Gold Coast Chinese restaurant for $10 per hour, which is the wage for 17 year-olds. However, she said, “$8 or $10 per hour is a usual wage for students. Everyone knows this happens but everyone complies and if I didn’t take that job others would. I had no choice.”

The minimum wage for 20-year-olds is $15.15 per hour. However, according to the Fair Work Ombudsman, international students are being paid wages meant for those under 17, 18 and 19 years of age.

Another Chinese student, who wishes to remain anonymous, currently works in a 7-11 convenience store where his legal wage should be $18 per hour in the daytime and $24 per hour at night. However, he only earns $9 in the day and $11 at night.

“I work 20 hours for $200, but only 10 hours is recorded, so it looks like I’m paid $20 per hour,” the student said. “I am so tired. I have to move heavy stuff  and work all night sometimes, but I’m paid less.” Despite this, he can say nothing about it because his employer might fire him and he needs this job.

Many students either accept the job conditions or face extreme financial stress if they do not work. For example, a young Chinese man, Rui Wang used to have two jobs; he was a cashier in an Asian market and delivered pizza at night because he had to support himself. Also, many students share housing, sleeping in lounge rooms to save money. Rent, food and transport are expensive on the Gold Coast and students struggle to meet these costs.

These low wages and the subsequent need to work overtime are not restricted to Chinese restaurants and other businesses managed by Chinese. It also happens in businesses operated by other nationalities.

A young Korean lady, Hyunjung Shin, works in a Japanese restaurant for up to 32 hours a week and is only paid $8 per hour. Her friend, also Korean, is working in a souvenir shop for $10 per hour.

Another Japanese student is paid just $9 per hour in a pizza shop with a Libyan employer. He once worked 60 hours in one week and earned $700, but his employer said nothing about the 20 hour per-week limit set by the Australian Government for student visa holders. Instead, he gave him a bonus for working extra hours. These students are forced to ignore the visa conditions or lose their income.

Ngan Minh Thao Tran, a Vietnamese girl, was paid $50 each day, which was $5 per hour, in a Thai restaurant for two weeks training. However, she said she learned nothing and worked by herself. “They didn’t help me a lot, but those two weeks were called ‘training weeks’, so I quit after two weeks, ” said Miss Tran.

After that, she found another job in a Vietnamese takeaway where she was paid $8 per hour for the first two weeks, then $9 per hour for the first year and then her wages increased by $1 an hour every six months. However, her minimum wage should have been $12 per hour when she started. “The wage increases so fast!” said Miss Tran with a wry smile.

One student who worked in a Taiwanese restaurant was only paid $4 per hour for six months. He said he knew it was unfair, but he needed the cash at the time. He stressed that the employers “want to save money in tax, save the money they withhold from the employees and there is no way to stop it.”

These examples indicate that students are not always given fair and legal treatment. A large number of employers pay students less than the minimum wage and justify it by claiming the wage is “tax free”. However, this is illegal. Fair Work Australia requires that all earners in Australia pay tax.

Increasing local unemployment rates are also making it difficult for students to find a job that pays fairly. It seems support from universities is necessary. Griffith University Career Development Officer, Maja Rauchle says she has heard of this terrible and difficult situation, and “students are not being treated very well”.

She states that if students report these illegal pay rates to authorities they may lose their jobs. Students are forced to accept these conditions because they are not informed about worker’s rights, making them vulnerable to exploitation by corrupt employers. Ms Rauchle added, “Often, it isn’t an Australian employer, but someone from another country.”

However, employers argue that this is not exploitation. Chinese employer Zhongyuan Zhou, running a Japanese restaurant, pays employees from $10 to $20, claiming the pay rates depend on whether the staff are in training or are senior staff. He asserts his employees are paid according to their abilities and hours worked.

“High wages demand high skills as well,” Mr Zhou said. “If a chef has good cooking skills and works full time I will pay him about $20; if a waiter does not use good communication skills with customers or is not here when I need him, I won’t pay him a lot.”

Mr Zhou took over the restaurant less than a year ago and has tried to change employment conditions to become more compliant. He said, “I want to follow the Australian rules but it’s not like I’m the only business cutting costs; others pay the same or even less.”
  
“I will definitely try to change this situation and follow the Australian laws, to make my restaurant more compliant. I will also avoid having students work more than 20 hours,” said Mr Zhou

Compliance is also a test for Indian employer, Kripal Singh, who is running an Indian restaurant named Kohinoor. He said he has no experience with this situation because he thinks it is wrong. “It’s unfair for students,” said Mr Singh. “I’ve heard this happened in an Italian restaurant. They said tax is the reason they pay cash.”

Mr Singh said some students need money and want to work more time, even if they are paid less money. However, he also thinks if a person does not have enough skills and does not know anything about the job, he cannot expect to receive the same high wage as someone who has experience.

Another employer, Weiguo Ruan from a Chinese restaurant, says he does not want to employ Australian students but only Chinese students, because they can speak both English and Chinese. This is good for customers, because most customers are Chinese tourists and many do not speak good English, according to Ruan.

Workplace equality is important and international students have the right to receive fair treatment. Students are aware of the need to protect this right. According to Workers on 457 – workers’ rights in Australia, students “have the same rights as any other workers in Australia”, but are unsure what to do about it. This unfair treatment represents an irony in relation to non-compliant employers and international students.

An interesting aspect is that most employers who pay international students less than the minimum wage are people who come from overseas themselves, which means international employers are depriving international students of their rights. However, not all employers are from different countries, some of the offending employers are Australian.

A Chinese student Le Yin is working for a cleaning company named Skinners Superior with an Australian employer named Sara (not her real name). Mr Yin is working as a housekeeper where the legal salary is $20 or $22 per hour, but he is only paid $10 per hour. He asked Sara once if he could get more money, yet Sara refused his request and said if he did not want this job he could go away.

“I don’t know about the locals’ salary but other international students only get $10 per hour,” Mr Yin said. “What's worse is they’re in arrears with my wages. They haven’t paid me for a month.”

He said the company always changes rosters at the last minute, which means they can cancel his work any time, even after he arrives at the work place. The reason he is still working there is because he needs work experience in the hospitality industry for his university studies.

While the international students’ place of study is usually the main source of information about employment rights, universities cannot officially interfere. However, universities do provide a job support system. For example, Ms Rauchle advises students of the correct way to find work, how to write their resume and how to be successful in an interview.

Ms Rauchle says the Fair Work website has a lot of information about work conditions and wages, as well as the Careers and Employment websites from most universities. She also mentions that a good level of English is one of the most important requirements for international students in Australia.

However, employees are fighting back. Bond University Chinese Student Community President, Mingjin Zhou, is working with Chinese Student Communities from other universities and planning a lecture to inform students of the laws regarding employment in Australia and offer advice on how to proceed when a student is affected by unfair work conditions.

Mr Zhou said one of his friends has to live in the garage because his parents loans for him to go to university and he wants to save money. He said, “Students should gain a clear perspective of their rights and raise their awareness about ways to protect their welfare. This lecture will be in their best interests.”
Overseas study is increasingly prevalent in the contemporary world. More and more international students, especially Chinese students, are traveling abroad for further study. However, Australia’s 15 billion dollar international student market could be under threat. It faces problems not only from a high Australian dollar and fierce overseas competition, but also from discontented students.

One international student, Chun Song, said he went to university orientation but there was only information on the companies. “If universities could guarantee students an intership while they study that would be great,” Mr Song said.

He said he understands that because rents are high, employers do not make a good profit and if they paid students normal salaries they might not make any money. Despite this, they are not allowed to deprive students of their rights and salaries.

“We just want to have the same rights as the local students,” Mr Song said.

(1971)




Contact List

A Chinese Student, Guyi Wei - 329633703@qq.com

A Chinese Student, Le Yin - zk_yinle@hotmail.com

A Chinese Student, Rui Wang - 466086371@qq.com

A Student, Chun Song - songchun127@hotmail.com

A Japanese Student, Hyunjung Shin - hyunjungshin@hotmail.com

A Vietnamese Employee, Ngan Minh Thao Tran - 0423 560 568

A Chinese Employer, Zhongyuan Zhou- 758334143@qq.com

A Chinese Employer, Weiguo Ruan - 5526 7528

An Indian Employer, Kripal Singh - 0430 450 100

A Career Development Officer, Maja Rauchle - m.rauchle@griffith.edu.au

A Chinese Student Community’s President, Mingjin Zhou - 531479917@qq.com


Are international students treated unfairly in Australia? <http://www.australiaforum.com>.

Australia in brief Tourism and international students. <http://www.dfat.gov.au>.

National minimum wage. <http://www.fairwork.gov.au>.

Part-Time Jobs For Students. <http://ezinearticles.com>.

Uni students from China (2002-2012). <http://andrewhong.net>.

Working in Australia: visas, taxes, minimum pay and rights. <http://www.meldmagazine.com.au/>.

Wednesday, August 29, 2012

Critical Essay

Article:
Astley, M 2012,
Mengniu looks to 'eliminate' small farm raw milk sourcing in quality assurance effort
http://www.dairyreporter.com/Regulation-Safety/Mengniu-looks-to-eliminate-small-farm-raw-milk-sourcing-in-quality-assurance-effort

Mengniu Milk
The purpose of this essay is to analyse and critique an investigative journalism article titled “Mengniu Looks to ‘Eliminate’ Small Farm Raw Milk Sourcing in Quality Assurance Effort” written by Mark Astley. Sales for the largest dairy producer in China, the Mengniu Dairy Group have slumped since the melamine milk scandal in 2008. This article elaborates how Mengniu improved their milk quality with practical action after their public apologies. The company will spend $435 million to phase out the small farmers whose milk quality was low and ensure that the raw milk from large farms is of better quality. They also intend to build at least eight ranches in Mongolia and western regions of China by 2015. A spokesperson from the company stated that the milk will be produced with scientific methods to improve the quality. Mengniu has also increased investment in advanced inspection equipment for the inspection of raw milk and finished products to ensure the safety and quality of the milk produced.

This article has a host of advantages and disadvantages as an investigative feature. In the first place, this topic is characterized by its newsworthiness. According to Conley (1997, p. 58), there are a few news values, such as impact, conflict, timeliness, proximity, currency, human interest, and the unusual. Since 2008, Mengniu has been the subject of repeated scandals, including a massive tainted milk scandal, melamine contamination and high levels of aflatoxin in dairy products. This positive story was big news because it provided evidence of product innovation at Mengniu to rebuild its reputation and raise confidence, both in the eyes of the public and the company itself.  Investigative journalism is about choosing issues for investigation that are relevant to people’s lives and concern matters that are important to the public (Kamsma 2010). Houston, Bruzzese and Weinberg (2002) claim that investigative reporting is “comforting the afflicted and afflicting the comfortable”. Infants, children and their parents were affected by the Mengniu milk event, therefore, this article explains the future plans of Mengniu in order to comfort people and could exert profound influence on the public. What is more, it has timeliness because the largest dairy producer of Danish, Arla Foods, has just became the largest shareholder in Mengniu, the article has “news calue of currency” (Conley 1997, p. 62). It was a good time to publish this article.
Farm

However, there is no particular method employed, such as questionnaires, experimental procedure and focus groups. The journalist does not state clearly how he carried out the investigation, how the information was selected or how he decided if it was relevant. The reporter received his current information from a spokesperson, possibly during a media tour, so all  the information is subjective and from the company.

Moreover, in spite of the fact that the style and structure of this report is suitable for an investigative feature, it lacks enough detail on a positive note. The title of this article concisely states the topic of the report. It is informative and descriptive and through reading the title, people understand the main issue of this article. At the beginning of the article, it states who, when, where, what and follows the “inverted pyramid” structure. It also mentions a little of the background. However, after the main descriptive and results sections, the discussion section needed to be more analytical. That is, although the author brings everything together and presents stakstics the important information is mainly subjective. He needed to be more objective and dig deeper into the facts.

This article is an independent report which provides satisfactory evidence, but there is not enough. The journalist used “primary” and “tertiary sources” (Pincus 2012, para. 2-4) in this article. This is illustrated by the use of “Mengniu spokesperson Chris Kwok told DairyReporter.com that...” and “Mengniu also announced that...” throughout this article. The source of this information is from an interview. There are a few statements from the company and the spokesperson of Mengniu, Chris Kwok, who is speaking on behalf of the company was interviewed voluntarily. In addition, investigative journalism cannot be judgmental and it needs to produce conclusive evidence (Research Methodology for Investigative Journalism: An Introduction1 2008). Evidence has been used in this article and is cited, leading to valid conclusions which show the public the determination of Mengniu to improve their milk quality.

This article appears to have no underlying biases or assumptions and to be fact-based, considered and a piece of public-oriented journalism. Nevertheless, this is not a balanced piece. There is no other evidence provided, such as “audio tapes, covert material, other forensic material” (Investigation Reports 2010, para. 10). More specifically, except for Mengniu company and the data the company offered, there are no other interviews, or experts from the ranches, or in the field of farming to give expert opinions on the new advanced inspection systems. Even though Mengniu has decided to build its own farms, it will take time before these farms will provide any substantial contribution to the milk supply. So, this article is not very persuasive.

This journalist uses feature writing conventions, although not to the best effect. The article includes the facts backed by evidence such as, figures and real information from real people, but there is no informed analysis. Also, it decribes the facts instead of conveying “emotion or atmosphere” (Pincus 2012, para. 2). Moreover, the journalist does not always use techniques to hold the reader’s interest. The lead is not an attention-grabbing “hook the reader” (Pincus 2012, para. 4). It offers information but does not whet the appetite successfully. The content simply presents the information. My suggestion for this piece is to add more data analysis, reporting of the findings and background research.

(996)



References List (Harvard)
Books

Conley, D 1997, The Daily Miracle, Oxford University Press, USA.

Houston, B & Bruzzese, L & Weinberg, S 2002, The Investigative Reporter's Handbook, Bedford, UK, London.

Websites
Astley, M 2012, Mengniu looks to 'eliminate' small farm raw milk sourcing in quality assurance effort, viewed 19 Aug 2012,
<http://www.dairyreporter.com>.

Investigation Reports 2010, viewed 19 Aug 2012,
<http://www.opi.vic.gov.au>.

Kamsma, J 2010, Towards a methodology for Web-based investigative reporting, viewed 19 Aug 2012,
<http://mastersofmedia.hum.uva.nl>.

Research Methodology for Investigative Journalism: An Introduction1 2008, viewed 19 Aug 2012,
<http://molambore.wordpress.com>.

Other Sources
Pincus, M 2012, ‘7506HUM Investigative Journalism Week 3/ 4 Lecture: Evidence’, Retrieved from Griffith University, School of Communication, Learning@Griffith web site:
https://learning.secure.griffith.edu.au/webapps/portal/frameset.jsp?tab=courses&url=/bin/common/course.pl?course_id=_116686_1&frame=top

Sunday, July 29, 2012

Meet the students – Vicky

Hi, My name is Yang Liu (Vicky), an International student from China. I'm doing a Master of Arts and Media. This is my second semester. I finished my Mass Media Bachelor degree last year. I learned a lot about how writing articles, using software to do editing work, making television news, even making movies. I worked for Chinese newspaper offices in China and Brisbane. I was responsible for writing news reports and editing. I like the media work.